The Portuguese version of "The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty": validation and clinical application / Versão em português do "The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty": validação e aplicação clínica

Abstract Introduction: The evaluation of surgical outcomes measured by patient satisfaction or quality of life is very important, especially in plastic surgery. There is increasing interest in self-reporting outcomes evaluation in plastic surgery. Objective: The aim of this study was to perform the translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of "The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty" from English to Portuguese. Methods: Retrospective study involving 50 patients undergoing to rhinoplasty comparing the preoperative period with the current postoperative situation (minimum 6 months and maximum 24 months postoperatively). Statistical analysis was performed to assess internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity and responsiveness. Results: No patients received a negative score on the visual analogue scale comparing preoperative and postoperative appearance. The postoperative improvement on the visual analogue scale revealed a Gaussian curve of normal distribution with a mean improvement of 4.44 points. The test-retest reliability showed a positive correlation between the postoperative response and the same questionnaire repeated ninety-six hours later. The internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha value: Preoperative = 0.88; Postoperative = 0.86). The authors observed a significant improvement in response for all individual questions in the postoperative phase as compared with preoperative situation (t-student test - p < 0.05). Conclusion: The Portuguese version of "The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty" is a valid instrument to assess patients' outcomes following rhinoplasty surgery.

Resumo Introdução: A avaliação do resultado cirúrgico medido pela satisfação do paciente ou qualidade de vida é muito importante, especialmente na cirurgia plástica, uma especialidade na qual há um crescente interesse na avaliação de resultados por auto‐relato. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi realizar a tradução, a adaptação transcultural e a validação do questionário "The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty", do inglês para português. Método: Estudo retrospectivo envolvendo 50 pacientes submetidos a rinoplastia comparando o período pré‐operatório com a situação atual (mínimo de 6 meses e máximo de 24 meses de pós‐operatório). A análise estatística foi realizada para avaliar a consistência interna, confiabilidade teste‐reteste, validade e capacidade de resposta. Resultados: Nenhum paciente recebeu pontuação negativa na escala visual analógica ao comparar a aparência pré‐ e pós‐operatória. A melhora pós‐operatória na escala visual analógica revelou uma curva gaussiana de distribuição normal, com melhora média de 4,44 pontos. A confiabilidade teste‐reteste mostrou uma correlação positiva entre a resposta pós‐operatória e o mesmo questionário repetido noventa e seis horas depois. A consistência interna foi alta (valor do alfa de Cronbach: pré‐operatório = 0,88; pós‐operatório = 0,86). Os autores observaram uma melhora significante nas respostas para todas as questões individuais na fase pós‐operatória em comparação com a situação pré‐operatória (teste t de Student - p < 0,05). Conclusão: A versão em português do "The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty" é um instrumento válido para avaliar os resultados do paciente após a cirurgia de rinoplastia.

Surgical Treatment of Chronic Parotitis

Abstract Introduction chronic parotitis (CP) is a hindering, recurring inflammatory ailment that eventually leads to the destruction of the parotid gland. When conservative measures and sialendoscopy fail, parotidectomy can be indicated. Objective to evaluate the efficacy and safety of parotidectomy as a treatment for CP unresponsive to conservative therapy, and to compare superficial and near-total parotidectomy (SP and NTP). Methods retrospective consecutive case series of patients who underwent parotidectomy for CP between January 1999 and May 2012. The primary outcome variables were recurrence, patient contentment, transient and permanent facial nerve palsy and Frey syndrome. The categorical variables were analyzed using the two-sided Fisher exact test. Alongside, an elaborate review of the current literature was conducted. Results a total of 46 parotidectomies were performed on 37 patients with CP. Neartotal parotidectomy was performed in 41 and SP in 5 cases. Eighty-four percent of patients was available for the telephone questionnaire (31 patients, 40 parotidectomies) with a mean follow-up period of 6,2 years. Treatment was successful in 40/46 parotidectomies (87%) and 95% of the patients were content with the result. The incidence of permanent and transient facial nerve palsy was 0 (0%) and 12 (26.1%), respectively. Frey syndrome manifested in 20 (43.5%) patients. Neither this study nor careful review of the current literature resulted in evident difference between SP and NTP regarding the primary outcome variables. Conclusion parotidectomy is a safe and effective treatment for CP in case conservative therapy fails. There is no evidence of a distinct difference between SP and NTP regarding efficiency, facial nerve palsy or Frey syndrome. (AU)